![]() So here are my suggestions for ALL developers and particularly ALL MANAGERS at Microsoft (not just OneNote developers): We are now 13+ years into the 21st century and are still having to deal with this awful design. ![]() Is maddening and gives OneNote a "Wal*Mart" feel of quality and conceptual execution. The ink is evidently "stranded" and positioned incorrectly on the page at this point. Page and add some text above the ink I've added, the text|graphic|table below the inserted text is pushed down on the page, but the ink is not. As a university professor I regularly and heavily use virtual ink on my tablets during my lectures, projecting my tablet's display on a screen instead of writing on a whiteboard or chalkboard.Įver since the inception of OneNote, Microsoft has, for some reason, never figured out that ink-based tablet users have these requirements:Ī) Group individual ink objects into a single graphic entity (for sizing, moving, anchoring, etc.), andī) Anchor ink objects to a text paragraph, or graphic, or a table cell, so that when the text|graphic|cell is moved, the anchored ink moves with it.ĭuring my lectures I frequently copy-and-paste a graphic (e.g., from the web, from a technical document, etc.) onto a OneNote page and then I add ink on top of the graphic to identify and comment on elements of interest. OneNote 2013 on ink-based tablets officially sucks.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |